Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Improving pg_dump performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/23/2018 06:47 AM, Ron wrote:
On 07/23/2018 08:46 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,

* Ron (ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
An interesting idea.  To clarify: it's possible to parallel backup a running
8.4 cluster remotely from a 9.6 system?
Yes, you can do a parallel backup, but you won't be able to get a
consistent snapshot.  You'll need to pause all changes to the database
while the pg_dump processes connect and start their transactions to
have the backup be consistent.

I can do that!!!

Assuming you can get this setup, have you tested some subset of your data on 9.6.9?:

1) Going from 8.4 --> 9.6 is jumping 7 major versions of Postgres. Do you know that the data/code will work in 9.6.9?

2) Does the transfer have time built in for fixing problems on the 9.6.9 end?

3) If the answer 2) is no, then is there a plan to deal with changes in the 8.4 database while working on the 9.6.9 database?


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux