Search Postgresql Archives
Re: Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
From
: Hans Schou <hans.schou@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:25:56 +0200
Cc
: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
6ac7183c-d93b-9fc5-d7a7-8d2f312be0c0@a-kretschmer.de
>
References
: <
CAApBw37fKf42KjQbt3cQfj7V4gx7LPAdLOMsLCRP__2TRRhvVg@mail.gmail.com
> <
6ac7183c-d93b-9fc5-d7a7-8d2f312be0c0@a-kretschmer.de
>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:44 AM Andreas Kretschmer <
andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
||pg_stat_reset()
Thanks, I guess we can see the result in a few days.
BTW, strang command: it only reset current database and it can't take db as parameter.
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
From:
Hans Schou
Re: Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
From:
Andreas Kretschmer
Prev by Date:
Is it ok to run vacuum full verbose command for live database for the tables which has more dead tuples?
Next by Date:
Re: Is it ok to run vacuum full verbose command for live database for the tables which has more dead tuples?
Previous by thread:
Re: Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
Next by thread:
Re: Shared buffers increased but cache hit ratio is still 85%
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Postgresql Jobs]
[Postgresql Admin]
[Postgresql Performance]
[Linux Clusters]
[PHP Home]
[PHP on Windows]
[Kernel Newbies]
[PHP Classes]
[PHP Books]
[PHP Databases]
[Postgresql & PHP]
[Yosemite]
