Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
From: Don Seiler <don@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:24:35 -0500
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20180613091657.2b8d81ae03f6297615f26284cd7372ff.fa0f73e131.wbe@email18.godaddy.com>
References: <20180613091657.2b8d81ae03f6297615f26284cd7372ff.fa0f73e131.wbe@email18.godaddy.com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:16 AM, <bend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can anyoen explain WHY there is such a big difference? Is it the SQL statement or a bug in the pgdump ?

Did you analyze the database after upgrading? Or at least the tables in question? Those are very different plans.

--

Don Seiler
www.seiler.us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
  - From: bend

Prev by Date: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Next by Date: RE: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Previous by thread: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Next by thread: RE: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux