On 06/05/2018 08:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 06/05/2018 04:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm getting a little tired of people raising hypothetical harms and
ignoring the real harms that we're hoping to fix. Yes, this is an
experiment and it may not work, but we can't find out without trying.
If it turns out to be a net loss, we'll modify it or abandon it.
Good to hear this is considered an experiment.
To that end will there be quarterly/yearly reports, suitably anonymized,
that spell out the activity that took place with reference to the CoC?
That seems like a good idea from here. I don't know exactly how much
can be reported without risking privacy issues, but surely we could at
least provide the number of incidents and how they were resolved.
Yeah I like it too. We don't have to give out any confidential
information but it adds to the transparency and allows the community as
a whole to see that.
regards, tom lane
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
