Your example is flawed because:
Multi-Partner has nothing to do with sexuality unless you want to make the argument that your belief is that a relationship should be between one person and another and in this argument a man and a woman which has literally nothing to do with the word multi or partner in a technical context.
Gay couples often call their significant other their partner. It's not uncommon, at least where I'm from. Partner can be a very politically charged word because of this, especially outside of a strictly business sense, e.g. LLP. Partner doesn't really have a "technical" meaning.
Does your insistence that my RPC isn't correct an attack on my RPC?
In short the fundamental outcome is that the community wouldn't let it get that far. We have 20 years of results to show in that one.
So, you're saying we don't need a CoC because in 20 years you've never had an issue? That doesn't seem like a good response.
