On 06/04/2018 01:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 06/03/2018 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
We are now asking for a final round of community comments.
Actually, it's intentional that we are not saying that. The idea is
that any interaction between PG community members is subject to the CoC,
whether it takes place in postgresql.org infrastructure or not, so long as
there is not another CoC that takes precedence (such as a conference's
CoC). The reason for this is an unfortunate situation that took place in
the FreeBSD community awhile back [1], wherein one community member was
abusing another via Twitter, and their existing CoC failed to cover that
because it had been explicitly written to cover only community-run forums.
So we're trying to learn from that mistake, and make sure that if such a
situation ever came up here, the CoC committee would have authority to
act.
O.k. I can see that. The problem I am trying to prevent is contributor X
being disciplined for behavior that has nothing to do with
PostgreSQL.Org. I am not sure what the exact good solution is for that
but it is none of our business if contributor X gets into a fight
(online or not) with anyone who is not within the PostgreSQL.Org community.
Thanks,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
