On 06/03/2018 09:21 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Sunday, June 3, 2018, George Neuner <gneuner2@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gneuner2@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
That's pretty much par for the public dynamic of this community. And,
as noted above, such a policy doesn't need the community at-large's
approval: it's a document that constrains those that wrote it.
If that is the case then it is of no real use as only a handful of
people wrote it. Otherwise could you explain what you mean?
I am completely in favor of civil discourse and behavior, but I am not
in favor of unenforcible red tape.
The core team does have enforcement tools at its disposal. They are at
least being open about the circumstances and extents under which they
would leverage those tools.
David J.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
