On 06/01/2018 10:27 AM, John Woltman wrote:
According to "dnf info", the repo is pgdg95, which I got from the
Postgres website. Since this looks like a packaging bug and not
specifically a Postgres bug, should I submit it
pgsql-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pgsql-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>?
No I would file it here:
https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3038
missing packages "proj49" and "geos36" in postgresql 9.5 repository
(dependencies of "postgis24_95")
You will need either a Postgres community account to log in:
https://www.postgresql.org/account/signup/
or third party accounts, see below:
https://www.postgresql.org/account/auth/4/
-John
John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 06/01/2018 10:06 AM, John Woltman wrote:
I'm attempting to install PostGIS2 (specifically postgis2_95 for
Postgres 9.5) on Fedora 28. When I run ``sudo dnf install
postgis23_95`` I get the the following the error:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides geos36 >= 3.6.2 needed by postgis23_95
Fedora 28 provides GEOS 3.6.1. Is my issue something that I
should bring up to the Fedora maintainers or to whoever's in
charge of the Postgres Yum repos?
What repo source are you using for the PostGIS package?
Thank you,
John
John Woltman
TPI • 302 New Mill Lane • Exton, PA 19341 • (610) 524-7260
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
