Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Planning to change autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor value to zero. Please suggest me if any negative impact.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Raghavendra Rao J S V wrote:
> We are using postgres 9.2  version on Centos operating system.  We have around 1300+ tables.
> We have following auto vacuum settings are enables. Still few of the tables which are always busy are not vacuumed. Due to that tables are bloating and observed few areas has performance degradation. 
> 
> autovacuum_max_workers = 6             
> autovacuum_naptime = 15s               
> autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 25       
> autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 10      
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1   
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.05 
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 10ms    
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = 1000    
> 
> To avoid the above problem, I am planning to make ' autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor' value to zero and  autovacuum_vacuum_threshold  value to 150. Please suggest me does it have any negative impact.

That's an excellent way to keep your database from functioning well.

Rather, raise autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit, or, more aggressively,
set autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay to 0.

It is better to change the settings on individual busy tables than
changing them globally.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux