On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 07:13:36PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Is it possible that pg_upgrade used 50M xids while upgrading? > > Hi Bruce. > > Don't think so, as I did just snap the safety snap and ran another > upgrade on that. > > And I also compared txid_current for the upgraded snap and our running > production instance. > > The freshly upgraded snap is ~50M txids behind the prod instance. Are the objects 50M behind or is txid_current 50M different? Higher or lower? > > If this is a not too uncommon case of users running amok, then this time > in particular they really went off the charts :-) I have never heard of this problem. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
