Hi, On 2018-03-05 17:57:51 -0300, Andre Oliveira Freitas wrote: > Ok, on one hand glad to hear that is an artifact, on the other hand > that means the issue is still out there... > > I'm not a maintainer of Freeswitch, I am an user of it. However I am > trying to supply the maintainers with any relevant information > regarding this issue. > > As you mentioned, I see the socket being modified and passed around in > the source code. Do you think the implementation is OK? I do not know > if that's standard practice when consuming libpq. It's ok to pass the socket around, it'd not be ok to change whether the socket blocks or not. I don't have the time to review the freeswitch code to see whether it does so. - Andres
