"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The STRICT-ness of a function seems like it should be viewable when using > \df+; is its absence just an oversight? I've been annoyed by that in the past. I have some vague memory of proposing adding it and being shot down, on don't-remember-what grounds. But I couldn't find any such discussion in a quick trawl of the archives, so maybe I'm misremembering. The only reasonable counter-argument I can think of now is that it'd make the display Even Wider ... but \df+ long since blew past any reasonable screen width. regards, tom lane
