Search Postgresql Archives

Re: postgresql9.5 partition table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Herrera
Thanks for your reply.
I will try it in postgresql10.
Regards,
Mark

发自网易邮箱手机版

2017年12月29日 21:46Alvaro Herrera 写道:
mark wrote:
> I defined a table using 1000 partition tables.
> When I deleted or updated this table. It used a lot of memory and
> postmaster process is killed by OS. When I defined the same table
> using 100 partition tables. It can normally be updated and deleted.
> what is reason of this?

Postgres 9.5 is not prepared to deal with thousands of partitions.

You can try the improved partitioning with the new syntax introduced in
Postgres 10 -- you may have better luck there.  Please test it.
If it still doesn't work, let us know in detail what you tested and how
it failed.

--
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux