Search Postgresql Archives

Re: AWS Aurora and PG 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: AWS Aurora and PG 10
From: Tory M Blue <tmblue@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:59:08 -0800
Cc: "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <trinity-80e7afe6-7d97-4445-a026-069449058830-1513700154316@3c-app-mailcom-lxa05>
References: <trinity-80e7afe6-7d97-4445-a026-069449058830-1513700154316@3c-app-mailcom-lxa05>



> On Dec 19, 2017, at 08:15, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Has AWS Aurora started supporting PG 10.  Their website still talks about 9.6.
> 
> Thanks
> 

Actually in us-west-1 9.x is not even available  <sigh>

Tory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AWS Aurora and PG 10
  - From: David G. Johnston

References:
- AWS Aurora and PG 10
  - From: Rakesh Kumar

Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Previous by thread: Re: AWS Aurora and PG 10
Next by thread: Re: AWS Aurora and PG 10
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux