Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL suitable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
From: "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:20:07 +0100
Cc: "pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <edbea5c041f24e2582236fe0c579dfd4@usb.ch>
References: <edbea5c041f24e2582236fe0c579dfd4@usb.ch>
Sensitivity: Normal

I think with 100TB the biggest challenge will be taking backups. PG has no real incremental backups offered in Oracle or SQLServer.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
  - From: Stephen Frost

References:
- PostgreSQL suitable?
  - From: Kellner Thiemo

Prev by Date: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Previous by thread: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux