On 10/18/2017 11:17 AM, Don Seiler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Vik Fearing
<vik.fearing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vik.fearing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 10/18/2017 05:57 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
>
> I support the policy of using caution with regards to new versions. They
> are often thought of as "bleeding edge" for the reason described by
> David G Johnston. The fact that PostgreSQL 10 was only released this
> month is critical and therefore is should not be a production server. It
> should be used as development, or QA, at best.
No, the Betas and RC should have been used in development and QA.
I disagree with this. It isn't my company's business to test the
Postgres software in development, as much as it would be needed and
appreciated by the community.
Exactly.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
