Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, I tried to reproduce this and could not. I experimented with >> various permutations of this: > This problem is probably related to commit 9b013dc238c, which AFAICS is > only in pg10, not 9.5. You're right, I was testing on HEAD, so that patch might've obscured the problem. But the code looks like it could still be O(N^2) in some cases. Will look again later. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
