Hi, On 2017-10-06 05:53:39 +0300, Vladimir Nicolici wrote: > Hello, it’s postgres 9.6. Consider setting checkpoint_flush_after to 16MB or something large like that. > I will probably try the compression on Monday or Tuesday, I can only > experiment with a single set of changes in a day, and I plan to test > something else tomorrow. > > Thanks for the suggestions, and sorry for the reply style, but my mail > client is not best suited for replying inline to individual points. You should consider getting a new mail client then... - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
