Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Briefly, just curious if legacy max values for shared_buffers have
>> scaled up since 8G was like 25% of RAM?
>>
>> Pg 9.3 on monster 2T/192 CPU Xenial thrashing
>>
>> Upgrade pending but we recently started having $interesting performance
>> issues at times looking like I/O slowness and other times apparently
>> causing CPU spins.
>
> Have you looked at things like zone reclaim mode and transparent huge
> pages? Both of those can cause odd problems. Also it's usually a good
> idea to turn off swap as the linux kernel, presented with lots of ram
> and a small (by comparison) swap file sometimes makes bad life choices
> and starts using swap for things like storing currently unused shared
> buffers or something.

Not sure but we're checking into these items.  Thanks


-- 
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres.consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx
p: 312.241.7800


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux