Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Final pg_dumpall should happen in Single-User-Mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just for the records, I asked here the same question and got some replies:

https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/186045/how-do-i-prevent-changes-to-my-database

Am 11.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Thomas Güttler:
I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to single-user-mode first.

With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine. After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.

My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was still alive and this process
inserted to the database after pg_dumpall has started.

I guess I am not the first one who did this stupid mistake.

What do you think? Wouldn't it be polite to add a note about this topic to the docs?

Here are the docs for pg_dumpall: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-dumpall.html

How could the wording look like? I am not a native speaker ....

Or do you have a better/different idea?

Regards,
   Thomas Güttler



--
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux