On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:36 PM, James Sewell <james.sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When Iook at timeline 15 I see this: > > 20 C74/45000000 no recovery target specified+ This refers to timeline 20. Are there other entries in this history file? Isn't timeline 15 a direct parent of timeline 20? > As 0000001500000C73000000A9 > 0000001500000C7400000044 I'm confused why > this WAL would be required? It's never been created on either server > (although the same suffix does exist in timeline 14). Your math is incorrect here. For me 0000001500000C73000000A9 < 0000001500000C7400000044, C73 being generated *before* C74. > The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or > professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this > email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this > communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or > otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your > incorrect receipt of this correspondence. The contents of this mailing list are public. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
