> On Sep 16, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Rafal Pietrak <rafal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > W dniu 16.09.2017 o 15:45, Adam Brusselback pisze: >> Here is the last discussion I saw on >> it: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/90261791-b731-a516-ab2a-dafb97df4464%40postgrespro.ru#90261791-b731-a516-ab2a-dafb97df4464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/90261791-b731-a516-ab2a-dafb97df4464%40postgrespro.ru#90261791-b731-a516-ab2a-dafb97df4464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > I can see the discussion is packed with implementation details. That's > promising :) > > Thenx! > > For those of us scoring at home, here's what I have: 1 You have a 6-deep hierarchy over 17 document types you concede that standard master-detail/inheritance accomplishes what you need w.r.t to documents 2 You don't have enough document instances to warrant partitioning 3 Your remaining problem is your workflow 4 You have an academic interest in multi-table indexing Does this sum up the situation? Have you shared your current schema? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
