Search Postgresql Archives

Re: BDR, wal segment has been removed, is it possible move forward?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6 September 2017 at 08:47, milist ujang <ujang.milist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Craig

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

BDR can, see bdr.skip_changes_upto .

Unluckily my bdr is 0.9.3
 
But PostgreSQL's logical decoding requires a contiguous WAL stream to maintain a valid catalog_xmin and restart_lsn, so it'll still fail to advance. So your replication from that node is broken, and you have to part the node then rejoin. You'll need to manually recover any diverged data.

Yup, I willing to reconcile data manualy via dblink or else,
is it still possible to move wal segment in 0.9.3?

Well, you can skip changes on the logical decoding stream manually in 0.9.3 using the underlying postgres functions. But it won't help you because what you broke when you deleted the WAL segments wasn't BDR, it was postgres logical decoding.

It *requires* a contiguous stream of WAL. It cannot recover if you do not have that. And you cannot really reset it.

You could drop and re-create the replication slot, I guess. But your nodes would be hopelessly out of sync and need manual resync (with data replication disabled) of one node vs another.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux