In article <spampit-3A2F1E.20451409112004@host170.octanews.net>, Klaas <spampit@klaas.ca> wrote: >In article <2vcp1nF2k0ftbU1@uni-berlin.de>, > Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> comp.databases.postgresql.general > >How about just comp.databases.postgresql or (shudder) >comp.databases.postgresql.misc? The whole point of this proposal is that c.d.p.general *already* exists in an unofficial sense on some servers, and that it should be made "official." Creating a new group with a different name will simply confuse matters on those servers that already carry c.d.p.general. -- Jon Bell <jtbellm4h@presby.edu> Presbyterian College Dept. of Physics and Computer Science Clinton, South Carolina USA ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
