Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Seems like something that should be handled by alter doesn't it? I have some vague memory that we intentionally didn't implement ALTER EXTENSION OWNER because we were unsure what it ought to do about ownership of objects belonging to the extension. If the answer is "nothing" then it wouldn't be hard to add such a statement. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general