Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/06/2017 20:30, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2017-06-22 18:10:40 +0300, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
Once again having pg_largeobject as a system-catalog prevents LOs
from working smoothly. Neither replication nor having LOs on a
different tablespace (by moving pg_largeobject) works.
I think logical decoding was designed for supporting DML SQL commands
(i.e. a finite set of commands) and not specific functions (lo_*)
which by nature can be arbitrary, infinite and version specific.
That's not really the reason. The first reason its currently unsupported
is that LOs are stored in a system catalog, and currently all system
catalogs are excluded from the change stream.  The second problem is how
exactly to represent the changes - we can't represent it as the whole LO
being changed, as that'd increase the volume of WAL and replicated
writes dramatically.  Thus we need to invent an API that can represent
creation, deletion, and writes to arbitrary offsets, for output plugins.

Thanx for the insight.


I wish PG in some future version will address these quirks so one can operate on LOs more smoothly.
You're welcome to help...


Greetings,

Andres Freund



--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux