On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote:
For completeness what does:
ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so
show?
(Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable,
now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully.
Hope that's OK?)
I can see the following:
$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 15 16:57 /usr/lib64/libssl.so ->
libssl.so.1.0.1e
Just to expand on that a bit :
$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 15 16:57 /usr/lib64/libssl.so ->
libssl.so.1.0.1e
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 11 12:41 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 ->
libssl.so.1.0.1e
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 440K Sep 22 2016 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.1e
Ah, sorry. A bit got truncated. Here you go:
/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.1.0.0, needed by
/db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libpq.so, may conflict with
libssl.so.10
/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [repmgrd] Error 1
Not sure what is going on here. My usual reaction to a message like
this when compiling is to install the --devel package for the library
involved. In this case I believe it would be something like:
openldap2-devel
OK, thank you. I'll pass that along to our UNIX team and ask for that to
be installed, see what we get ...
This is just an off the top of the head suggestion, no warranty:)
What? You mean I can't get my money back? :)
Many thanks for all the help so far. It's been very, very, helpful. I'm
sure it's nearly there ...
Regards,
Martin.
--
Martin Goodson
"Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?"
"Yes, Jamie, I believe I have."
"What're you going to do?"
"Bung a rock at it."
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
