Tom et al, On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Igor Korot <ikorot01@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I do not see any arrays named "length", nor even any arrays of size 2, >>> on that page, so I'm pretty confused what you're talking about. Please >>> be more specific. > >> I based my code on this: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26911855/correct-way-to-bind-numeric-values-to-prepared-sql. >> Sorry about that. > > Ah. Well, we can't be responsible for random bits of code posted on > stackoverflow. > >> Nevertheless, while it did compile by MSVC and gcc, it looks like >> Xcode fails with compiling that code. > > Seems to me clang is being overly picky, but whatever. > >> So, is there any solution to this which can be used cross-platform? > > Don't use an initializer, assign the values one at a time. Yes, that's what I ended up doing. > > Back in the day we used to avoid use of initializers for local variables > because they weren't too portable. It's depressing to see clang > introducing new reasons for them not to be portable. OK. It would be nice to see what Borland would do in this case. ;-) BTW, what do you guys use to build binaries for OSX? clang? gcc? Thank you. > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
