OK. I think I found a bug in PostgreSQL (9.3).
When I do:
CREATE ROLE ronb
SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
Everything works. I can create the schemas and upload the backup correclty.
But if I do:
CREATE ROLE "ronb" LOGIN
NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
GRANT users TO "ronb";
NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
GRANT users TO "ronb";
CREATE ROLE users
SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
It doesn't work. ronb user still can't create schemas eventhogh the role users give ronb permission to do so.
The GRANT here is worthless.
Also, PostgreSQL doesn't show the GRANTS of role in the same order as they were given (In PgAdmin). It sort them alphabeticly which is highly confusing!
If for example you run "alter table x add column" you know that the new column is added last (if you refresh the table you will see it last).
But if you add another GRANT statment to user it won't be in the last.. you have no way of knowing the correct order of GRANTS.
ב אפר׳ 19, 2017 17:26, Adrian Klaver כתב:On 04/19/2017 07:16 AM, Ron Ben wrote:
> Here :)
Thanks.
See my previous response. Basically we need more information before this
can be solved.
> I think I may have found the problem.
>
> The role defined as:
>
> CREATE ROLE "ronb" LOGIN
> NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
> GRANT users TO "ronb";
> GRANT users2 TO "ronb";
>
> users is a group role:
>
> CREATE ROLE users
> SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
>
> users2 is a group role:
> CREATE ROLE users2
> NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
> GRANT reports TO users2 ;
>
>
> I think PostgreSQL doesn't know how to handle this conflicted commands.
> What PostgreSQL does when such conflic appears? does it take the last
> known command of grant?
>
> Sadly, when there are more than one role it's impossible to know which
> role was first. PostgreSQL shows them alphabeticly rather than by date
> so in case of overlaping instructions its impossible to know which one
> was first.
>
>
> ב אפר׳ 19, 2017 17:01, Adrian Klaver כתב:
>
> On 04/19/2017 06:49 AM, Ron Ben wrote:
>
> Is it possible to get your email program to left justify text on
> sending? I can figure out the right justified text, it just
> takes me longer.
>
> > I think I may have found the problem.
> >
> > The role defined as:
> >
> > CREATE ROLE "ronb" LOGIN
> > NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
> > GRANT users TO "ronb";
> > GRANT users2 TO "ronb";
> >
> > users is a group role:
> >
> > CREATE ROLE users
> > SUPERUSER INHERIT CREATEDB CREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
> >
> > users2 is a group role:
> > CREATE ROLE users2
> > NOSUPERUSER INHERIT NOCREATEDB NOCREATEROLE NOREPLICATION;
> > GRANT reports TO users2 ;
>
> That may or may not be the problem. See:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-createrole.html
>
> "The INHERIT attribute governs inheritance of grantable
> privileges (that
> is, access privileges for database objects and role
> memberships). It
> does not apply to the special role attributes set by CREATE ROLE
> and
> ALTER ROLE. For example, being a member of a role with CREATEDB
> privilege does not immediately grant the ability to create
> databases,
> even if INHERIT is set; it would be necessary to become that
> role via
> SET ROLE before creating a database."
>
>
> What you show above is part of the answer. The other parts are the
> actual privileges on the objects. Also the command that created
> the dump
> file that you are trying to restore. Permissions/privileges
> issues can
> be complex and solving them requires a complete set of information.
>
> >
> >
> > I think PostgreSQL doesn't know how to handle this conflicted
> commands.
> > What PostgreSQL does when such conflic appears? does it take
> the last
> > known command of grant?
> >
> > Sadly, when there are more than one role it's impossible to
> know which
> > role was first. PostgreSQL shows them alphabeticly rather than
> by date
> > so in case of overlaping instructions its impossible to know
> which one
> > was first.
> >
> >
> > ב אפר׳ 19, 2017 16:40, Adrian Klaver כתב:
> >
> > On 04/19/2017 03:56 AM, Ron Ben wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm using PostgreSQL 9.3.2
> > > I'm running the command:
> > >
> > >
> > > psql -h testserver -U ronb -f backup.sql -q -d foldertest
> > 2>error.txt
> > >>output.txt
> >
> > What was the command that created backup.sql?
> >
> > >
> > > This should generate my database in foldertest
> > >
> > > However this doesn't work. It's unable to create schemas
> > >
> > > in the error.txt i see "permission denied for database
> > foldertest".
> >
> > What user is the foldertest owner?
> >
> > In psql l will tell you this.
> >
> > >
> > > I know this is not an access permission issue because there is
> > a public
> > > schema which is buildin and it does create the tables/data in
> > there.
> >
> > Because the public schema is by default open to all:
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/ddl-schemas.html
> >
> > "A user can also be allowed to create objects in someone else's
> > schema.
> > To allow that, the CREATE privilege on the schema needs to be
> > granted.
> > Note that by default, everyone has CREATE and USAGE privileges
> > on the
> > schema public. This allows all users that are able to connect to
> > a given
> > database to create objects in its public schema. ... "
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It just cant create new schemas.
> >
> > In psql do dn+, that will show schema owners and who else has
> > privileges.
> >
> > For what the different privileges are and how they are
> > represented in
> > the above output see:
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-grant.html
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The intresting thing is that if I do:
> > >
> > > psql -h testserver -U postgres -f backup.sql -q -d foldertest
> > > 2>error.txt >output.txt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Everything works. It create all schemas and generate the
> > database correctly.
> >
> > Because the postgres user is a superuser and can do anything.
> >
> > >
> > > I don't see any diffrent in the hba.conf between postgres and
> > ronb users.
> >
> > That is not the issue. pg_hba determines who can connect, what
> > you are
> > seeing is the Postgres privilege system determining what a user
> > can do
> > once they are connected. If it had been a pg_hba rejection you
> > would
> > have seen something like:
> >
> > aklaver@tito:~> psql -d production -U guest -h localhost
> > psql: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "::1", user "guest",
> > database "production", SSL on
> > FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "::1", user "guest", database
> > "production", SSL off
> >
> >
> > To get an overview of what users there are in your database
> > cluster in
> > psql do du
> >
> >
> > >
> > > What can be the problem?
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrian Klaver
> > adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
