Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Using xmin and xmax for optimistic locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:44:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> >    where table.*::text = (saved from select).
> 
> > If the row was changed between the time it was first read and updated, the
> > update will do touch any rows as the ::text will be different.
> 
> > Why can't we use xmin and xmax columns to achieve the same.
> 
> Well, that doesn't do quite the same thing: the cookbook query will
> proceed if there was a no-op update in between (or maybe even two updates
> that canceled each other out).  If you look at xmin then you won't proceed
> in such cases.  I could imagine either behavior being "right" depending on
> your application needs.

Also a consideration: table.*::text may become quite unwieldy
if there's one or more BYTEA columns in the table.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux