2017-02-16 5:38 GMT+01:00 Teddy Schmitz <teddy.schmitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
As a quick follow up I just did an explain on the query,
Aggregate (cost=258007258.87..258007258.88 rows=1 width=8)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..184292254.83 rows=14743000807 width=16)
-> Seq Scan on t1 (cost=0.00..3796.41 rows=263141 width=8)
-> Materialize (cost=0.00..1088.40 rows=56027 width=8)
-> Seq Scan on t2 (cost=0.00..808.27 rows=56027 width=8)
It seems it has to do a loop on 14 billion rows? Can someone explain why this would happen?
sure - you did Cartesian Product https://www.tutorialspoint.com/sql/sql-cartesian-joins.htm
for bigger tables it should be pretty slow and it is expected behave
Regards
Pavel
Thanks,
Teddy
From: Teddy Schmitz
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:32:41 PM
To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Problems with GreatestHello,
I have a query using Greatest that hangs and never returns when called with two tables.
Postgres Version: 9.6
Tables
t1{ id bigint }
t2 { id bigint }
they are sharing a sequence
the query
select greatest(max(t1.id), max(t2.id)) from t1, t2;
The purpose was to call setval on the sequence after doing a bulk data load into the database. But this query never returns. I have tried it with various combinations,
select greatest(max(t1.id), 6) from t1; -> This returns
select greatest(max(t1.id), 6) from t1, t2; -> This never returns.
The query does work if there is only a few hundred items between the tables but I'm importing about ~300,000 rows between the two tables. I looked at pg_stat_activity and it says the query is active
I worked around this problem using a union all query but I'm wondering if this is a bug or I am just using greatest wrong.
