Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Queries are taking way longer in 9.6 than 9.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

after looking at the explain plans again, I very much doubt those come from the same query. The reason is the 9.5 plan contains this part:

    ->  HashAggregate  (cost=67.54..68.12 rows=192 width=4)
          Group Key: d.vip_patient_id
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.17..67.44 rows=192 width=4)
                ->  Index Scan using unq_user_name on tblcnaccounts ...
                      Index Cond: ((user_name)::text = 'dddddd'::text)
                ->  Index Only Scan using idx_tblcndoctorpatientmap ...
                      Index Cond: (master_user_id = a.master_user_id)

while the 9.6 plan does not include anything like that, i.e. there's only a single aggregate at the top level, without any group keys. Also, the SQL query you've provided does not include any GROUP BY clause, so I claim that those plans are from two different queries.

regards
Tomas

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux