At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:32:19 +0000, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in <CAJycT5reA+q7X_czMFURfcSy-QNoycorEsTWySL1qoTFwyoxzg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option. > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall <ktm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4? > > > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point. > > > > > > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it > > > closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to > > > cause it not to work any more. > > > > > > Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the > > > same job done? > > > > > > -- > > > Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect > > that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it. As more official statement, this page says that it supports PG9.5 as of 1.3.3. http://pgxn.org/dist/pg_repack/doc/pg_repack.html > pg_repack 1.3.3 > Added support for PostgreSQL 9.5 Latest version seems 1.3.4. The requirements on the page looks somewhat stale. > Requirements > PostgreSQL versions > PostgreSQL 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4 regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
