On 12/7/2016 4:02 PM, metaresolve wrote:
I used to use Access to do my data crunching, matching, and cleaning at my old job. I worked with a max of 600k records so Access could handle it. I know, lame, but it's what I knew.
Access is really 2 completely different things bundled. One is that rather weak and poor "Jet" sorta-relational database that sorta implements a subset of SQL. The other is a database application development system oriented around forms and reports.
My thought was to use postgreSQL as a kind of more advanced Access that I could use to crunch numbers on similarly. However, My file has 1.1M records on it and pgadmin seems to be choking on it.
Postgres, on a properly scaled and tuned database server, can handle billions of records. Obviously, doing something silly like querying all billions at once will never be fast, thats a lot of data to marshal and process.
-- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
