Search Postgresql Archives

Re: warning about oom_adj with PG 9.4 logger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Sinclair, Ian D (Ian)" <isinclair@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> While loading 9.4 in my system I got a warning that oom_adj is deprecated, which seems to have come from the postgres logger task. I found emails in the archives that this error was fixed in 9.3.3.1 but did the same thing get missed in the logger code? Is it fixed later? I'm working on an upgrade to 9.6.

PG 9.4 won't try to touch oom_adj unless it's built with a compile flag
to tell it to do so.  Apparently, whereever you got your PG build from
was not on the same page as your kernel about which OOM API is preferred
or deprecated.  It's probably just cosmetic anyway, so I'd say ignore it.

9.5 and up have a better design for this, in which the behavior is
determined on the fly rather than being hard-wired at build time.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux