On 12/03/2016 09:38 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote:
So is the 9.4 instance the production/live database?
Essentially, but it's not heavily used: this is me messing around on a dev box.
So what happens when you specify the port in your psql connection, eg:
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql --dbname=doom --username=doom -p 5432
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql --dbname=doom --username=doom -p 5433
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql --dbname=doom --username=doom -p 5434
With /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql, only "-p 5433" connects, the
other two complain like so:
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5434"?
Alright how about?:
/usr/bin/psql --dbname=doom --username=doom -p 5434
My suspicion is that when you did the source build you got some cross
contamination of libraries.
If it where me I would get rid of the instance that you built from
source, assuming that there is nothing important on it.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
