Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



På tirsdag 15. november 2016 kl. 08:48:37, skrev Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@xxxxxxxxx>:
 
 
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This item isn't valid, is it?
 
  • There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This problem relates with previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search.
RUM being an extention, and having index-access-methods as extentions is new in 9.6, where phrase-search was introduced, this isn't really true, or am I missing something?
 
 
RUM is very good for phrase search, since it has access to coordinates in index, check slides from PGconf.eu (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgconfeu-fts-2016.pdf).  Where did you find the citation ?
 
https://github.com/postgrespro/rum#user-content-introduction
 
I assume I read the item wrong tho. As it's phrased, it (for me at least but I'm Norwegian) seems like phrase-search is not possible with GIN, which it definitely is. So I assume the real issue, that this item is trying to point out, is that phrase-search isn't really optimized with GIN, just syntactic sugar. And with RUM it is optimized, not just syntactic sugar. Am I correct assuming this?
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas@xxxxxxxxxx
www.visena.com
 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux