otar shavadze <oshavadze@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> " -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..23.80 rows=533
> width=0) (actual time=35.054..35.054 rows=90052 loops=1)"
> " Index Cond: (my_array @> '{8}'::integer[])"
Seems like your problem here is that the planner has no idea about the
selectivity of this condition --- if it did, I think it would have
made the right choice, because it would have made a much higher estimate
for the cost of the indexscan.
AFAICT, Postgres 9.5 does make a reasonably correct guess when given
up-to-date stats. I speculate that you need to ANALYZE this table.
If there are a lot of distinct possible values in the arrays, increasing
the statistics target for the column might be needed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
