Re: Turning slave into a master - PostgreSQL 9.2

[Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@xxxxxxxxx>]

2016-11-01 10:33 GMT+13:00 David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi guys,

I got a test server, let's call it test01.

The test01 has a basebackup from the master.

I want to turn test01 into a master. It doesn't need to catch up with the wal_files, because I don't need it to be up-to-date.

So what I did is:

- Replaced /var/lib/pgsql/9.2/data/ with the basebackup

- Created recovery.conf:

restore_command = 'cp /var/lib/pgsql/wal_archive/%f %p'

recovery_target_timeline = 'latest'

standby_mode = off

trigger_file = '/tmp/pg_failover_trigger' 

- touch /tmp/pg_failover_trigger

- service postgresql start

And then postgres starts recovering the wal_files. But I don't want that.. as I don't need a up-to-date

Is the wal_files required anyway?

 

​"...has a basebackup from the master" - the answer to your question depends greatly on the detail behind that sentence.

IIRC, unless you know that the data directory is consistent - because the database was offline at the time of the backup - at least some WAL will probably be required to bring the inconsistent backup data directory to a known good state (i.e., post-checkpoint).

David J.

​

​

 

I see...

as I'm recovering a slave and then turning it into a master, that's why the wal_files are required.

Thanks!

Patrick