Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_upgrade not able to cope with pg_largeobject being in a different tablespace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På torsdag 13. oktober 2016 kl. 16:09:34, skrev Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx
> >:
> 
>     On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
>     > I would assume that having pg_largeobject in a separate tablespace is
>     more and
>     > more common these days, having real-cheap SAN vs. fast-SSD for normal
>     tables/
>     > indexes/wal.
> 
>     So common that no one has ever asked for this feature before?
> 
> Sometimes one gets the feeling that one is the only one in the universe doing
> something one considers "quite common":-)

Yes, I often feel the same way.  :-)  Like, why am I the only person who
thinks this is a natural thing to do.  I find a lot of bugs that way.  :-)

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux