On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tomáš Uko <uko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >> >> >> >> We have encountered same problem as you (in 9.5.4), it seems that so far it >> hasn’t been ported back from 9.6, but if you take this commit and apply it >> to 9.5 source codes, it seems to be working >> >> But anyway, does anybody knows plans about backporting this to 9.5 official >> way? > > Won't happen. Only bugs get ported back, and performance enhancements > generally don't qualify (in very exceptional cases they might but this > issue is a routine performance enhancement). Basically you have to > decide to update or stay with 9.5. Another possibility is to patch and build yourself Postgres if you are still willing to use that with a given version. But as that's actually forking the upstream version, it won't be supported by community. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
