Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Jeff Janes (jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > We require complete data isolation. Absolutely nothing should be shared
> > between two tenants.
> 
> Then you need different clusters per tenant.  Otherwise, the WAL records of
> different tenants are inextricably mingled together.

Different clusters are also required to have independent file-level
backups, independent roles, independent tablespaces, etc.

It's also far easier to move a single cluster from one system to another
to adjust for growth than to try and move an individual schema or
database.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux