>You sound like you think that varchar(50) is somehow cheaper than text. The biggest impediment to text cols in other RDBMS is no index allowed. If PG has an elegant solution to that, then yes I see the point made by the original poster. |
>You sound like you think that varchar(50) is somehow cheaper than text. The biggest impediment to text cols in other RDBMS is no index allowed. If PG has an elegant solution to that, then yes I see the point made by the original poster. |