On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:45:47AM +1000, dandl wrote: > > Agreed. Stonebraker measured Shore DBMS, which is an academic > > database: > > > > http://research.cs.wisc.edu/shore/ > > > > If he had measured a production-quality database that had been > > optimized like Postgres, I would take more stock of his "overhead" > > numbers. > > Exactly! And that's what I'm asking: has anyone done or know of any figures for Postgres, to set against these? Uh, well, there are Postgres tools that measure the overhead of locking on queries and stuff. I don't know any numbers myself. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
