Search Postgresql Archives

Re: LOG: could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



we have a pooling on the application level. however we never had this issues before this start happning since last couple of days in past we had over 2300 sessions but no issues.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/25/2016 5:10 PM, Ahsan Ali wrote:
yes it is older however we do apply security patches now a then.

redhat doesn't really support mixing packages from different releases, they only test things with all packages from the same snapshot.   "yum update" should bring the whole system up to current.


regarding max connection its the application design however it does not have that many active session. postgres=# select count(*) from pg_stat_activity;
 count
-------
  1818

so there were 1818 postgres client processes at the time it coudln't create a new process.   thats certainly a larger number than I've ever run.   if I have client software that has lots and lots of idle connections, I use a connection pooler like pgbouncer, in transaction mode.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux