Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, I'm aware about ability to create temp functions, but this is actually too much overhead - I mean unneeded boilerplate code, but it seems in current state it is "the least evil" which I have to use.

I think 'what i need' is support for following
- ability to switch session language from 'sql' to 'pl/pgsql'
- in that mode - ability to declare session-scope variables, 'DO' is just not needed after that
- SELECTs not targeted into a variable - are written to client output
- (C) Merlin Moncure - "Ability to embed collection of statements in the database under a name and invoke those statements via CALL <name>, which does not automatically create a transaction and a snapshot (unlike functions/DO)"

All this seems to be a huge change which will definitely not appear any time soon.

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Chris Travers <chris.travers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If all you want is a temporary function, you *can* create it in the pg_temp namespace though that seems hackish.

Maybe a better solution would be to extend CREATE FUNCTION in a way that allows you to CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION?

...

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor lock-in.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux