Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael,

* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [Action required within 72 hours.  This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Stephen,
> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > 9.6 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> > message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1.  Consequently, I will appreciate your
> > efforts toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> I am not sure what's Stephen's status on this item, but I am planning
> to look at it within the next 24 hours.

That'd be great.  It's definitely on my list of things to look into, but
I'm extremely busy this week.  I hope to look into it on Friday, would
be great to see what you find.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux