That's 3 years and 3 months with absolutely zero maintenance. Apart from the scripts I left back then. During that time, it was used by an average of 10 people, some 9T of sensor data entered at the rate of 60G/week, and another 3T of analysis data was produced. The expression "cutting down on maintenance" could be appropriate. But that was not my decision. Right now, updating is really difficult. They're on a rush, and they are using the server 15 hours a day and maybe they'll need the weekend as well. Plus, the OS is now old as well, the ports tree is out of sync with the OS... it will all be a lot harder. -- Miguel A Qua, 13-07-2016 às 14:19 -0700, John R Pierce escreveu: > On 7/13/2016 2:11 PM, Miguel Ramos wrote: > > Yes. > > Both 9.1.8, I checked right now. > > 9.1 is up to 9.1.22, thats a lot of bug fixes you're missing. 9.1.8 > was > released 2013-02-07, 9.1.22 in 2016-05-12 > > > -- > john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz > > > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
