Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2

Subject: Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
From: Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:17:33 +1200
Cc: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAJNY3itwZY+bCQcZKFF1MXTA7XX-spi1ZPg0oGy3r_uuG3wQ9w@mail.gmail.com>

If the master server can't send the wal_files through the slaves, shouldn't the wal_files be in "background" waiting to be delivered?

Otherwise what's the purpose of them? If a network fails I'd loose those files?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Adrian Klaver
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Patrick B

References:
- Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Patrick B
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Andreas Kretschmer
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: John R Pierce
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Patrick B
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Patrick B
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Adrian Klaver
- Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2
  - From: Patrick B