El 20/06/16 a las 09:50, Melvin Davidson escribió: > > >>but it won't let it grow too (or am I missing something). > > Yes, you are missing something. By partioning and {Vacuum Full only the > table with data no longer needed}, the rest of the data remains > available to the users > AND space is reclaimed by the O/S, so it's the best of both worlds. That's not entirely true. Think about a SELECT which has to scan all child tables. Your are also adding another layer of complexity to the system. -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general